How did we get the bible we have 
				today? Bible Study - Bible Charts  and a collection of 
				Bible 
				study tools
				
			    	Bible Study
				
					In the beginning: People did not have 
					personal copies of the Bible until the nineteenth century. 
					Before the invention of printing, books were copied by hand 
					and were extremely expensive. Printed books did not become 
					inexpensive until quite recently. The public reading of the 
					scriptures is a feature of both the synagogue and the church 
					(1 Timothy 4:13); therefore, early Christians heard the 
					Bible read out loud to them during the service. Bible study 
					was mostly conducted in groups, though it was possible for 
					individuals to go to a nearby church or synagogue and 
					consult the scriptures themselves. In the first century, the 
					apostolic writings that the Church later adopted as the New 
					Testament were considered secondary to the oral teachings of 
					the apostles and their accredited representatives.
					Apocrypha  
The Apocrypha consists of the material in the 
					Septuagint that does not appear in the Hebrew Bible. 
					Anglicans, Methodists, Lutherans, and others use the 
					Apocrypha as a worship resource and as instruction in faith 
					and morals, but do not use it to formulate doctrine. The 
					Roman Catholic Church and the eastern churches use it as 
					part of the Old Testament. The Apocrypha contains the 
					history of the Maccabean revolt, which is vital to 
					understanding the political backdrop of the New Testament 
					and the origin of the Jewish holiday of Hanukah. 
For 
					more details, see The Apocrypha and the Old Testament.
					
Canon (thing)  
The word canon comes from the name of 
					a reed that grows straight enough that it can be used as a 
					measuring stick. Therefore, a canon is a standard or norm.
					
(The word ‘canon’ can also refer to a person.)
					The by-laws of the ancient Church were called canons. (Many 
					modern churches still call their by-laws canons.) When we 
					speak of the canon of scripture, we mean the standard list 
					of books that are recognized by the Church as Holy 
					Scripture—or more specifically, the church by-law that 
					affirms that list. 
Some people think that officials in 
					the ancient Church sat down and went through a stack of 
					writings, accepting some as part of the New Testament and 
					rejecting, banning, and suppressing others. That was not the 
					case. It was actually a process in which the Church defended 
					writings that were already in use as Scripture as they came 
					under attack. For example, when Marcion began a campaign to 
					exclude the gospels of Matthew, Mark, and John, they were in 
					already in use as Scripture. It wasn’t until then that the 
					Church needed to issue a formal statement that they are 
					indeed Scripture. Eventually it became necessary to issue a 
					list of canonical books, not to exclude the ones that 
					weren’t on the list, but to defend the ones that were. 
					
The history of the canon does not tell you when a given 
					book of the New Testament first became Scripture. It tells 
					you when it first became necessary for the Church to defend 
					it as Scripture. The history of the canon is the history of 
					the defense, not the acceptance, of New Testament books.
					
The ancient Christian writings that are not part of the 
					canon today were never actually rejected; they were just 
					never accepted. The ancient Church was a persecuted minority 
					that was unable to ban or suppress books, but it did neglect 
					the books in which it had little interest. Some writings 
					were never widely accepted, because the ancient Church felt 
					they were heretical. For instance, the ancient Church never 
					had much interest in the Gospel of Thomas. Other ancient 
					Christian writings that never found their way into the New 
					Testament were still recognized as orthodox and were still 
					used authoritatively as we would use church by-laws or 
					devotional writings, but not as scripture. For example, the 
					Didache, the Apostolic Constitutions, the epistles of 
					Clement and Ignatius, various ancient liturgies, and the 
					Nicene Creed were all influential in ancient times and still 
					play a role in modern ecumenism.
The Nicene Creed, 
					though not scripture, is canonical, because it appears in 
					the canons of the first three ecumenical councils. It was 
					formulated at the first ecumenical council of Nicea in 325, 
					it was expanded at the second ecumenical council at 
					Constantinople in 381 to defend the deity of the Holy 
					Spirit, and it was made inalterable by local councils at the 
					third ecumenical council at Ephesus in 431.
The 
					ecumenical councils never dealt with the New Testament 
					canon, because there was no need. Local or regional councils 
					were able to resolve any disputes about it. 
					Documentary Hypothesis  
The documentary hypothesis was 
					first advocated by Wellhausen in the nineteenth century. It 
					theorizes that the Pentateuch (the first five books of the 
					Bible) are composite documents. The constituent documents 
					are detected through literary analysis. The theoretical 
					component documents of the Pentateuch are called J, E, D, 
					and P. J is characterized by the use of Yahweh as God’s 
					name; E is characterized by the use of Elohim to refer to 
					God, D is essentially Deuteronomy, and P is characterized by 
					sacerdotal regulations, such as are found in Leviticus. 
					There is no physical evidence to back up the documentary 
					hypothesis; it is based solely on literary analysis. The 
					recent Book of J, which purports to be the J document of the 
					documentary hypothesis, is a literary reconstruction. You 
					can get more information about the Documentary Hypothesis.
					
Eisegesis  
A common term for the imputation of a 
					preconceived idea into scripture; the opposite of exegesis. 
					It is an invalid method. The difference is whether you are 
					going to the Bible to back up what you have already decided 
					to believe (eisegesis), or if you are going to the Bible for 
					guidance in deciding what you should believe (exegesis). 
					
Epistle 
Epistle comes from the Latin word epistola, 
					which simply means a letter (as in written correspondence). 
					The epistles of the New Testament follow the form for 
					letters in the first century. Letters in those days did not 
					come in envelopes, so they began with the name of the 
					sender, followed by the name of the recipient, and then a 
					greeting. (The Epistle to the Hebrews lacks these features.) 
					After the body, the letter contained detailed greetings to 
					the recipients. Paul subtly reworded the usual greeting, 
					“greetings to you,” so that it read “grace to you.” 
					
Exegesis  
The analysis of scripture to discern its 
					meaning. It is a form of higher criticism. Historically, 
					there are three major exegetical methods, each of which 
					dates from the earliest times and each of which has its uses 
					and abuses: 
Symbolic or Allegorical  
This form of 
					Biblical interpretation is often used by the New Testament 
					to interpret the Old Testament: for example, Galatians 
					4:21-31, and most of Hebrews. In this category fall the use 
					of types and antitypes, or any method that finds a 
					consistent symbolism throughout scripture. 
					
Grammatical-Historical  
This form of Biblical 
					interpretation attempts to discern the meaning of the text 
					by examining the cultural, historical, sociological, and 
					linguistic context of the scripture. 
Rational 
					 
This 
					method of Biblical interpretation deduces meaning from 
					assertions in different parts of the Bible. 
Some modern 
					exegetes characterize their exegetical method as literal, 
					which is actually a misnomer. Literalists commonly use 
					deductive reasoning, grammatical-historical data, and 
					symbolism in their interpretations. A more accurate term for 
					literal interpretation would be face-value interpretation. 
					Exegetical methods that have originated in modern times 
					include form criticism and redaction criticism.
					Form 
					Criticism  
Form criticism is a technique of higher 
					criticism that seeks the message of the New Testament by 
					analyzing the literary forms in which the message is given. 
					Within form criticism, the terms legend and myth have 
					specialized meanings: a legend is a historical account used 
					for didactic purposes; a myth is any pictorial 
					representation of an abstract truth. 
Gospel 
					 
The 
					English word gospel is the modern form of godspell, which 
					means good news. We use it to translate the Greek word 
					euangelion, which also literally means good news. In New 
					Testament times, an euangelion was a public proclamation 
					that a new king had conquered his enemies and had ascended 
					to the throne. The first four books of the New Testament are 
					gospels, because their primary purpose is to announce that 
					Jesus is Lord, to tell us how He ascended to His throne, and 
					to convince us to submit to His Lordship. The gospels, 
					though they contain historical facts, are not primarily 
					biographies, they are essentially press releases. In fact, 
					in John 21:25, John states outright that his book does not 
					contain complete information about Jesus’ life and deeds. 
					The term gospel therefore refers to any of the following:
					
Any written or oral proclamation that Jesus is the King 
					of the universe, including details about His triumphant 
					ascension to His throne. 
One of the first four books of 
					the New Testament—Matthew, Mark, Luke, or John. 
A 
					selection from one of the first four books of the New 
					Testament, read aloud in church as part of the synaxis, also 
					called the Service of the Word. 
Hermeneutics 
					 
The 
					branch of theology that devises, evaluates, compares and 
					applies methods of interpreting the Bible. It also devises 
					criteria for determining which methods are appropriate in a 
					given circumstance or for a given passage. You can “do 
					hermeneutics” without actually interpreting a Bible passage, 
					because hermeneutics is the study of interpretation methods, 
					not the application of them. 
Higher Criticism 
All 
					Biblical scholarship can be divided into higher and lower 
					criticism. Higher criticism is the analysis and study of 
					scripture to determine its authorship, date of composition, 
					literary structure, or meaning. Most Bible study falls into 
					the category of higher criticism; anyone who has an opinion 
					on what the Bible means is technically a higher critic. 
					
Lectionary 
A lectionary is a schedule of Bible readings 
					that are used in worship throughout the year. The intent is 
					that the passages appointed for the day are to be read to 
					the congregation and that the sermon is to be based upon 
					them. The purpose of a lectionary is to assure that all 
					parts of the Bible are used in proportion to their relative 
					importance, and at the right time of year (that is, 
					resurrection stories at Easter, nativity stories at 
					Christmas, and so forth). Modern lectionaries contain only 
					the scripture citations, but ancient lectionaries contained 
					the complete text of the readings. Ancient lectionaries are 
					a major source of information for the scholars who 
					reconstruct the original text of the New Testament. Today, 
					most denominations that use a lectionary have agreed upon 
					the Common Lectionary, which is divided into two parts: the 
					Sunday Lectionary, which goes through the entire Bible in 
					three years, and the Daily Lectionary, which goes through 
					the entire Bible in two years. The concept of the lectionary 
					was inherited by Christianity from Judaism. You can get more 
					information about the lectionary. 
Lower Criticism
					 
					All Biblical scholarship can be divided into higher and 
					lower criticism. Lower criticism is the study and analysis 
					of manuscript evidence to determine the original wording of 
					the original text of the scriptures. Lower criticism 
					produces the text that is used by translators. 
					
New 
					Testament  
New Testament is the term for the Christian 
					scriptures. Testament is the Latin word for will, as in last 
					will and testament; it translates the Greek word diatheke, 
					which means covenant. We use the word testament because 
					God’s covenant, like a will, is unilateral. The term comes 
					from 1 Corinthians 11:25, where Paul quotes Jesus as 
					proclaiming a new covenant from God. There are no variations 
					in the canon of the New Testament in Christendom. The 
					earliest extant list of New Testament books is contained in 
					Bishop St. Athanasius’ Easter Letter, which was issued in AD 
					367. 
Old Testament  
Old Testament is the Christian 
					term for the Jewish scriptures. Testament is the Latin word 
					for will, as in last will and testament; it translates the 
					Greek word diatheke, which means covenant. We use the word 
					testament because God’s covenant, like a will, is 
					unilateral. The term comes from 2 Corinthians 3:14, where 
					Paul refers to the Hebrew scriptures as the old covenant. In 
					the first century—and in the preceding centuries—there were 
					two canons of scripture among the Jews. 
The Palestinian 
					Canon  
The Palestinian canon is in Hebrew and Aramaic, 
					was used by Jews in Palestine. Modern Jews and most 
					Protestants accept only the Palestinian canon. 
					
The 
					Alexandrian Canon 
The Alexandrian canon appears in the 
					Septuagint, contains everything in the Palestinian canon, 
					plus a few additional books. We call the additional books 
					the apocrypha. The Septuagint was used by the very large 
					Greek-speaking Jewish community in Alexandria, Egypt, and by 
					Jews scattered throughout the Roman Empire, who spoke Greek, 
					and who held their synagogue services in Greek. The early 
					Church inherited the Septuagint from the synagogue, and used 
					it so effectively in evangelism that the Jews eventually 
					disowned it. In the fourth century, St. Jerome, a biblical 
					scholar whom the bishop of Rome had commissioned to produce 
					a new Latin translation of the Bible, wanted to remove the 
					apocrypha from the Old Testament, thus abandoning the 
					Alexandrian canon for the Palestinian canon, but the Church 
					did not heed his advice. During the Reformation, Martin 
					Luther took up Jerome’s position. Today, the eastern 
					Churches and the Roman Catholic Church still recognize the 
					apocrypha as Scripture. Lutherans, Episcopalians, and 
					Methodists accept the apocrypha as a worship resource and 
					for instruction in faith and morals, but do not base any 
					doctrine upon it. 
All Christian Bibles list the books of 
					the Old Testament in the order that they appear in the 
					Septuagint. 
Q  
Q is a hypothetical document which is 
					supposed to be the literary source for the three synoptic 
					gospels. (Q stands for Quelle, which means source in 
					German.) There is no physical evidence that Q ever existed; 
					the evidence is found solely in literary analysis. 
					
Redaction Criticism 
Redaction criticism is a technique 
					of higher criticism that analyzes the New Testament 
					(particularly the gospels) to deduce the author’s intent or 
					viewpoint. Some redaction critics go so far as to deny any 
					historicity at all in the gospels. 
Septuagint 
					 
					Centuries before Christianity, there was a large Jewish 
					community in the Greek colony of Alexandria, Egypt. With the 
					permission and cooperation of the Temple in Jerusalem, they 
					translated the Jewish scriptures (our Old Testament) into 
					Greek for their own use. The translation is known as the 
					Septuagint, meaning seventy, because about 70 scholars 
					worked on it. 
The Septuagint became the Bible for 
					Greek-speaking synagogues all over the Roman Empire and 
					became the Bible of the early Christian Church, which also 
					spoke Greek. When the New Testament quotes the Old 
					Testament, it quotes the Septuagint, not the Hebrew. The 
					Septuagint is more messianic than the Hebrew, and it backs 
					up Christian claims about Jesus very well. The Jews 
					eventually disowned the Septuagint.
The Septuagint 
					contains additional material over and above the Hebrew 
					Bible. This additional material is called the Apocrypha.
					
In Christian Bibles, the Old Testament books appear in 
					Septuagint order—Law, History, Writings, and Prophecy. The 
					New Testament books are arranged in the same way—Gospels, 
					Acts, Letters, and Revelation.
Synoptic Gospels 
					 
					
The synoptic gospels are Matthew, Mark, and Luke. Synoptic 
					means with one eye, signifying that the synoptic gospels, as 
					opposed to the gospel according to John, tend to have the 
					same perspective on Jesus’ ministry. Starting Page > 
					Explanations > Top of this Page 
Copyright ©1995-2008 
					by the Rev. Kenneth W. Collins and his licensors. All rights 
					reserved
				
				
				Home | 
				Inspiration | 
				Know Your Bible | 
				Music 
				Videos | Humor | 
				Prayer Request | 
				Bible Help Verses |
				Bible 
				Scriptures By Subjects |
				King 
				James Online Bible |USA 
				Founders Quotes|
				Read The Bible in 
				One Year | 
				Bible 
				Quotes That Inspire |
				
				eStore